To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think such a "win 8 sucks" generalization is wrong.
Win8 is not one product. Its multiple products. We have Win8 desktop and server, win8 x86 for tablet, win8 RT for tablet and WP8.
Win8 desktop suffers most. It's in a transition-state with modern (Metro) and classic (win7) both in one. Not bad per se but both those desktop UIs are half done. Classic misses classic elements like startmenu. Metro misses proper adaption to desktop.
What will they do with server version?
For the tablet RT suffers most. It has only disadvantages to x86. Its again classic (x86) and modern (RT) again but modern is incompatible.
Then there is WP8. Its only modern (Metro). Its incompatible to classic.
They tried/try to bring all that together but are close away. Most important are a desktop optimized desktop metro, a better classic desktop and a public win32 for ARM API.
Edited 2012-11-13 20:13 UTC




Member since:
2012-06-22
I was actually talking about Windows 8.
Surface RT is a lousy idea as well. A Windows tablet that doesn't run Windows programs at a price higher than Android tablets. Just awful. Oh and a name that confuses consumers to top it off. Sinofsky is a clueless hack and developers were right about him from the beginning.