Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542601
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Could somebode explain me
by smashIt on Thu 15th Nov 2012 07:04
in reply to "RE[3]: Could somebode explain me"
AMD had 750, 760 chipsets in early Athlon era (some data about them in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_chipsets ). But IIRC they were quite expensive, people were mostly buying VIA-chipped motherboards.
i've never seen the 760 in the wild, but the 750 was realy popular
could be because it was one of only 2 chipsets for slot-a
RE[5]: Could somebode explain me
by zima on Thu 15th Nov 2012 07:13
in reply to "RE[4]: Could somebode explain me"
I don't think I've ever seen either of them live, period (probably because of being in a more price-sensitive place - mostly only the arrival of Duron made the K7 architecture really popular, and those were typically paired to, ugh, VIA KT133(A); at least VIA did improve over time ...I keep here an AthlonXP 1700+ with VIA KT600, it had no issues)




Member since:
2005-07-06
AMD had 750, 760 chipsets in early Athlon era (some data about them in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_chipsets ). But IIRC they were quite expensive, people were mostly buying VIA-chipped motherboards.
Also, while the northbridges were relatively performant, AMD southbridges had somewhat limited functionality ...resulting in a number of "hybrid" motherboards: AMD northbridge, VIA southbridge (made easy by the connection still used by then: PCI). Which reintroduced quirks typical of VIA back then...