Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 22:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542683
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-14
Maybe it won't be enough to buy AMD, maybe the legal challenges are to great and old cross licensing agreements will be broken.
anyway just saying
Microsoft is powerful enough to force Intel to the negotiating table. Microsoft buys AMD and tells Intel it wants the x86 license transferred.
Intel says no.
Microsoft announces that the next version of Windows will only run on Power.
Intel cr*ps itself...
The next day Microsoft announces it has changed its mind. Somewhere in the small print something about an x86 license is mentioned.