Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 23rd Nov 2012 14:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 543213
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-08-19
That was my thought, too. Commenters here are almost all thinking of HP as a company selling printers and crappy laptops - not as a company that does a lot of consulting work, and sells a lot of big-iron hardware. And it's those areas where they're getting a thorough ass-kicking lately, where they're competing rather unsuccessfully with Oracle and IBM.
Partly that's because they're reliant on Oracle supporting them as a platform, which isn't really a good position to be in - Oracle obviously have no great incentive to make HP look good. But in large part it's simply that their offerings are crap compared to their competitors - there's really not much reason to buy a big HP server, instead of a comparable IBM or Oracle/Sun machine...