Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th Nov 2012 16:32 UTC
Gnome Not even GNOME itself could ignore the GNOME 3 criticism for much longer. "As part of the planning for the DropOrFixFallbackMode feature, we've decided that we will compile a list of supported gnome-shell extensions. This will be a small list, focused on just bringing back some central 'classic' UX elements: classic alt tab, task bar, min/max buttons, main menu. To ensure that these extensions keep working, we will release them as a tarball, just like any other module."
Thread beginning with comment 543768
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by Luminair
by Hiev on Fri 30th Nov 2012 23:32 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Luminair"
Hiev
Member since:
2005-09-27

Dude, just give it up, you have no idea of what are talking about, stop humulliating your self with your ignorance already.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[7]: Comment by Luminair
by ndrw on Sat 1st Dec 2012 00:27 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Luminair"
ndrw Member since:
2009-06-30

Can you please just stop polluting the forum with your rude comments? I think by now everybody knows that Gnome Shell has a devoted user.

As for Redhat, I wish them all the best. But at least at my work place there is no use for Gnome Shell (to say he least). There are zero RHEL servers here, one hundred RHEL desktops, and a dozen of large number crunching machines that need remote X access. The whole industry has just started transitioning to RHEL 6 so whatever comes next must look like UNIX (that's why we started using RHEL in the first place).

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[8]: Comment by Luminair
by Hiev on Sat 1st Dec 2012 01:28 in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Luminair"
Hiev Member since:
2005-09-27

Calling someone ignorant is not an insult, and now, about the RHEL, they will prolly use GNOME 3 also, because, in corporations, they don't care about childist complaines or trolls, you know. I bet you $50 they will deploy GNOME 3.

Edited 2012-12-01 01:28 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2