Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th Dec 2012 16:56 UTC, submitted by estherschindler
Thread beginning with comment 544343
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: X's era is in the past
by zima on Thu 6th Dec 2012 10:02
in reply to "RE: X's era is in the past"
The car interface has stopped evolving
Maybe not yet - autonomously driving cars are sort of a quite different concept, interface-wise.
Additionally, computerised dashboards are often quite horrible, there's a place for lots of improvement with them (they're often so bad that I wouldn't mind Apple focusing on the area, providing integrated solution for auto makers; with the influence of big & lavish US market on car designs, all would improve hopefully)
RE[3]: X's era is in the past
by Novan_Leon on Fri 7th Dec 2012 16:41
in reply to "RE[2]: X's era is in the past"
The problem with evolving car interfaces has to with the inherent advantages of a physical interface. Nobs and buttons in a car are a huge advantage due to the physical feedback and thus not needing to take your eyes of the road. I've seen cars with touch-screen based interfaces such as the Tesla Motors Model S (http://www.teslamotors.com/models) and I cringe at the prospect of having to take my eyes off the road to do something as simple as change the AC temperature.





Member since:
2005-07-06
That's not really true, what about the DRI2 extension?
If you squint enough, DRI2 is very similar to Wayland which is not surprising as it is the same author.
Note also that in some environement (ARM, virtualisation) the GPU is very limited..
The car interface has stopped evolving, will the desktop UI still evolve a lot, possible but not likely.
Uh? What "large impact"? Slightly smoother fonts?