Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Dec 2012 23:24 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544766
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-07-07
They aren't going to do the moronic console thing and use CPUs that are cutdown versions of custom server/mainframe class CPUs.
Why when you can get someone like AMD to slap together a single board design quad core CPU, 7700-7900 class GPU and 4-8Gb of standard DDR3 ram?
Aside from the fact that it's a custom mobo doesn't increase the price much considering they will be ordering them in lots of a few hundred thousand at a time, what saves cost is that the chips themselves will be bog standard consumer parts with a custom UEFI that only allows for Valve's SteamBox version of Linux to be booted.
All they need is to have the console reliably hit between 30-60FPS at say 1920x1080 which is fairly easy for today's high end GPUs when you don't turn on anti-aliasing, especially when the game devs can tweak their ports for that specific hardware since they know a large portion of their customers will be using that exact setup.