Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 21:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 544880
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-08-13
Have you ever tried running a 2.6.x or 3.x kernel on a 386 or 486? It's miserable. They use about twice the RAM of a 2.4.x kernel, and the 2.4.x tree didn't get its last update until last year. This makes me a little sad from a nostalgic point of view, but if Linus isn't upset his original Linux machine won't work with a current kernel, I guess nobody else has the right to complain.