Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Dec 2012 15:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 546524
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Good idea, wrong producer
by MOS6510 on Sat 29th Dec 2012 09:53
in reply to "RE[7]: Good idea, wrong producer"
That's a fun bit of trivia of course.
But I don't doubt this watch would make a great timer for a bomb. It's cheap, you can get it everywhere, its battery lasts a very long time and it has an alarm.
The downside is though that the alarm is daily, meaning you can't use it to detonate a bomb outside a period of 24 hours. So once set you need to place it within 24 hours. Once set you can't disarm it, unless you build in another device.
I guess if you're in to electronics it wouldn't be too difficult to make a timer device that gives you a much more flexible range.
Personally I'd go for remote controlled bombs, giving you the greatest control over the exact detonation time.
RE[9]: Good idea, wrong producer
by zima on Mon 31st Dec 2012 00:15
in reply to "RE[8]: Good idea, wrong producer"





Member since:
2005-07-06
Yeah, that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casio_F91W#Claimed_use_in_terrorism part is... curious