Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 29th Dec 2012 16:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 546615
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
Wait, what? You're saying they should just ignore the laws of the countries they live in and possible face severe consequences just to please you?
Maybe. Or maybe they'd stop maintaining the distro. Or maybe something else. Whatever they chose as their course of action, however, is none of your business. If they face legal consequences then you have absolutely no right whatsoever to complain if they choose to protect themselves.
Because, obviously, Ubuntu, Mint, Fedora et.al. are all aimed at the western civilizations. There are separate distros for the Chinese and for them China is more important.
No. One is about legality, the other is about ideology. You're comparing apples and oranges.
Are they based in the US? If not then that's a wholly irrelevant comment.
Indeed. Neither have VLC, for example. You know why? Because they originate from France.