Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Jan 2013 01:41 UTC, submitted by lucas_maximus
Thread beginning with comment 548093
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: not all these changes are strictly necessary
by Soulbender on Thu 10th Jan 2013 09:11
in reply to "RE[2]: not all these changes are strictly necessary"
RE[3]: not all these changes are strictly necessary
by Laurence on Thu 10th Jan 2013 09:54
in reply to "RE[2]: not all these changes are strictly necessary"
Laughable, one could as easily say Linux is a much better server, firewall, and server than fugly, old and slow OpenBSD.
To be frank, anyone who complains that a server isn't pretty clearly isn't the sort of person who should be giving advice on which enterprise OS to run on production systems.
RE[3]: not all these changes are strictly necessary
by tidux on Thu 10th Jan 2013 17:00
in reply to "RE[2]: not all these changes are strictly necessary"




Member since:
2008-09-24
Well, they already do the server, firewall and routing side better than Linux so I guess they have to move on to something new
Laughable, one could as easily say Linux is a much better server, firewall, and server than fugly, old and slow OpenBSD.