Linked by MOS6510 on Thu 10th Jan 2013 23:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 548286
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: true, but some libraries...
by kwan_e on Fri 11th Jan 2013 01:14
in reply to "RE: true, but some libraries..."
What are you talking about?! The STL and Boost are bloated and ugly; and worst of all they produce the most useless, verbose, garbage compile-time errors. (Admittedly the ugliness of those errors are partly due to C++'s template implementations, and STL and Boost are far and away the best set of libraries for C++)
The problem there is the lack of adequate tooling for C++. C++ templating should have been largely fixed by having Concepts. Too bad it didn't make it into the standard.
RE[2]: true, but some libraries...
by dorin.lazar on Fri 11th Jan 2013 01:26
in reply to "RE: true, but some libraries..."
The STL and Boost are bloated and ugly; and worst of all they produce the most useless, verbose, garbage compile-time errors.
I see little bloat in STL, although for a while I was misguided as well, and thought that STL was too bloated. It isn't. STL is quite small and quite elegant; I would not be afraid of using it.
With Boost I can agree that it's a bloated animal, but nobody says you should use Boost. It's just too big, and sometimes you need a smart pointer.
But now, C++11 really comes in and saves the day. It does make the STL more efficient, and makes you need less features of Boost. It adds the smart pointers you need in the standard, as well as threading and timing. It's quite nice, you should try it.
The errors are indeed awful; but maybe this is something that can be improved.
RE[3]: true, but some libraries...
by Brendan on Fri 11th Jan 2013 02:41
in reply to "RE[2]: true, but some libraries..."





Member since:
2007-04-06
What are you talking about?! The STL and Boost are bloated and ugly; and worst of all they produce the most useless, verbose, garbage compile-time errors. (Admittedly the ugliness of those errors are partly due to C++'s template implementations, and STL and Boost are far and away the best set of libraries for C++)