Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Jan 2013 23:28 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless The smartphone world is, at this point, a two-horse race. Android has the numbers, Apple's iOS has the figures. Everything else - Symbian, Windows Phone, BlackBerry, etc. - are also-rans. Irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Even though, say, Windows Phone not making any serious headway into the market, despite boatloads of money poured into the platform, RIM still thinks it can do better with BB10. Austrian website Telekom-Presse has a pretty detailed video hands-on with a BB10 device - the Z10 - and it left me with one burning question: what is BB10's identity?
Thread beginning with comment 549072
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by matt4pack
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 16th Jan 2013 21:10 UTC in reply to "Comment by matt4pack"
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Thanks for offering detailed counter points like so many others have done in the comments here. You saying "bah I disagree with the article so it's crap!" is the high point of this comment thread, and you have totally and utterly convinced me of the errors of my ways.

I will proceed to preorder a BB10 straight away. Thanks!

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Comment by matt4pack
by matt4pack on Wed 16th Jan 2013 21:31 in reply to "RE: Comment by matt4pack"
matt4pack Member since:
2013-01-16

What do you want me to say? I'm not going to argue with you on every point you tried to make because most of it is incoherent.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/blackberry-10-hands-on-awesome/

http://gizmodo.com/5974362/the-complete-blackberry-10-video-walkthr...

Need more?

Edited 2013-01-16 21:40 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[3]: Comment by matt4pack
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 16th Jan 2013 22:20 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by matt4pack"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

What is incoherent about it? Can you give some examples? I think the article is overly coherent, as I specifically focussed on just one flaw (no identity) and then proceeded to give several reasons as to why I believe it to be so. There's nothing incoherent about it - as evidenced by the fact that people seem to understand the article just fine.

Now, you may *disagree* with the points I made - that's fine, that's why we have comments. Several readers have already posted excellent comments with different perspectives, and I've learned a great deal already. I disagree with said commenters that the features they name are defining/will save the platform, but that's a different matter altogether. I respect them, and they me, because we are having an open discussion for all to see.

However, throwing personal insults around is not going to get you any goodwill, and it certainly won't give anybody here any new insights. I suggest you either try to contribute in a meaningful way, or not at all.

Reply Parent Score: 2