Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 19th Jan 2013 14:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 549469
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Solution to a non-existent problem
by someone on Sat 19th Jan 2013 18:07
in reply to "RE[4]: Solution to a non-existent problem"
RE[6]: Solution to a non-existent problem
by zima on Sat 19th Jan 2013 18:11
in reply to "RE[5]: Solution to a non-existent problem"
Also the comments...
UNIX received plenty of work, as much as any other platform but the hurdle was higher in that we stripped out Qt.
"if this means that qt will be staticly linked then it's very disappointing in todays world."
It means it is totally removed and no longer required at all. Hence UNIX required a bigger rewrite than the other platforms.
It means it is totally removed and no longer required at all. Hence UNIX required a bigger rewrite than the other platforms.
Removing Qt means we can support both Qt and Gtk styles natively!
PS. You edited your post while I was replying...
In general, when Qt was included, it was just used on *nix for platform integration purposes... (as the first link above states)
PPS. Also, in 2006, before the removal of Qt: http://my.opera.com/community/forums/topic.dml?id=156356
Opera for Linux hardly uses Qt at all. It is only used for things like system dialog boxes. The rest of the user interface is written with an internal GUI toolkit called "Quick".
Edited 2013-01-19 18:21 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-06
Opera doesn't use Qt as its toolkit
http://my.opera.com/kilsmo/blog/2008/01/29/opera-is-not-based-on-qt
http://my.opera.com/desktopteam/blog/2009/12/22/from-all-of-us-to-a... (search for "Qt" in this one)