Linked by kragil on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 20:26 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 550149
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Laurence
by dagw on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 21:44
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Laurence"
RE[5]: Comment by Laurence
by lucas_maximus on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 22:56
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Laurence"
RE[6]: Comment by Laurence
by Nelson on Wed 23rd Jan 2013 23:08
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Laurence"
RE[5]: Comment by Laurence
by Loreia on Thu 24th Jan 2013 09:35
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Laurence"
RE[6]: Comment by Laurence
by Nelson on Fri 25th Jan 2013 02:25
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Laurence"





Member since:
2005-11-29
It takes time to adjust, but Go's declaration syntax is novel and helpful, especially when dealing with complex types.
Go:
f func(func(int,int) int, int) int
C#:
var f = Func<Func<int, int, int>, int, int>
There is just no sane way to write the syntax generally. I'm scared to even think what this would look like in C++.