Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 22nd Jan 2013 21:28 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 550238
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-07-28
i am not sure about that point. Besides all the usual points there is most of the time the issue of accountability.
If a company needs to run software seamlessly but problems arise during implementation there is not much of accountability i can think of. Perhaps if a company uses one of the GNU office packages who will they talk to?
And i really don't buy anymore that free argument. It does cost money to train people (down to the people actually working with programs) to have a staff to ensure operation etc... You do save the licencing cost, the rest is the same.