To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually, something that costs so much that no normal person can afford damn well better be top-notch quality! So the few people who paid out their ass just got a buggy, poorly designed system? Wow... seriously, it's almost starting to seem like this thing was specially designed to be a failure.
Why is it a buggy system? I have a feeling you're saying this because of the date "limitation". I don't think there are many computers that would last 12 years. The Amiga came and went after the Lisa before the year 1995 arrived.
The Lisa may have been expensive, but so was the IBM PC. The IBM PC was even more expensive and it was the lesser computer (if you forget about available software).
The targeted audience wasn't, probably, the people at home, but the business world, just like the IBM PC. During that time people used home computers at home like the VIC-20, Commodore 64, ZX Spectrum and later the MSX line, Atari ST, Amiga.
It does make you wonder why these home computers were more fun, had better sounds/graphics and even better GUIs than the Lisa/Mac/PC, but were much cheaper and why the PC still won out in the end.





Member since:
2011-05-12
Considering the price I don't thing it really mattered if it was crap or the best thing since sliced bread: no one could afford one.
The points pointed out were things most people probably didn't know about the Lisa. Not only was it a commercial failure, but also overshadowed by the Macintosh. This makes the Lisa an enigma for most people, even Apple fans.