Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Feb 2013 13:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551632
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Blame the publishers not only Microsoft.
by silviucc on Wed 6th Feb 2013 14:07
in reply to "Blame the publishers not only Microsoft."
Why the hell should it be forbidden!? 2nd hand books can still be sold and bought legally in a lot of countries. No publisher demanded money for that.
I guess people in book publishing have a lot more brains than the ones doing games/music/movie publishing.
Edited 2013-02-06 14:11 UTC
RE[2]: Blame the publishers not only Microsoft.
by JAlexoid on Wed 6th Feb 2013 14:14
in reply to "RE: Blame the publishers not only Microsoft."
RE[2]: Blame the publishers not only Microsoft.
by rft183 on Wed 6th Feb 2013 15:59
in reply to "RE: Blame the publishers not only Microsoft."





Member since:
2005-07-08
Of course Microsoft is also a publisher, but in the last years there has been growing an uneasiness among all publishers to even allow a second hand market to exist.
This is why most AAA games now have DLC as a way to prevent the games to be re-sold.
Second hand shops don't need to give any money back to the publishers, nowadays if you read game developer's magazines the phenomenon is seen as worse as piracy, because currently it cannot be legally forbidden.