Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Feb 2013 20:57 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 551904
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Linux version is very poorly packaged
by ebasconp on Fri 8th Feb 2013 17:04
in reply to "RE[2]: Linux version is very poorly packaged"
should I blame the ubiquitous Linux repos and their single-click installs and automatic updates instead? Hmmm...
Yes, you should!
I actually prefer the Mac way where every app is self contained. Duplicity of "shared-libraries" exists but such duplicity solves the versioning DLL hell.
PC-BSD's PBI installers work in this way too; easier to install, remove, deploy, etc.
Edited 2013-02-08 17:09 UTC




Member since:
2007-04-25
So all those setup.exe "wizards" and manual updates on Windows are the wave of the future, and I should blame the ubiquitous Linux repos and their single-click installs and automatic updates instead? Hmmm...