Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Feb 2013 09:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 552614
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Not surprising, but then again...
by _txf_ on Fri 15th Feb 2013 14:51
in reply to "Not surprising, but then again..."
Think about the amount of power it will take to run 4k games at 50 frame per second - not expecting a massive jump in 3D performance.
There is no way in hell that 4k games will exist in 2 years. Whilst 4k resolution is achievable, you'd have to sacrifice too much scene complexity, in effect reducing the visual fidelity of games. Also think of the bandwidth consumption of the textures required to look good at 4k.
What you might see is 1080 (or slightly larger) upscaled to 4k and then antialiased, but definitely not native.




Member since:
2005-10-28
I suspect it will sell as well as the Playstation Vita will, but it's too early to tell. I'm more interested in seeing how the next Playstation/Xbox fare, and personally I think both should hold off for another year or two, rake in more profits from games, then we'll get better machines more capable of running 4k games. Think about the amount of power it will take to run 4k games at 50 frame per second - not expecting a massive jump in 3D performance.
Edited 2013-02-15 14:37 UTC