Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Feb 2013 16:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553013
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by shmerl
by shmerl on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:31
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by shmerl"
RE[8]: Comment by shmerl
by lucas_maximus on Tue 19th Feb 2013 20:35
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by shmerl"
To quote Jaron Lanier
There are other cases that involve creativity and imagination. A crowd process generally fails in these cases. The phrase “Design by Committee” is treated as derogatory for good reason. That is why a collective of programmers can copy UNIX but cannot invent the iPhone.
http://www.jaronlanier.com/gadgetcurrency.html





Member since:
2005-11-29
Open development means shit if the end product sucks. Its just more chefs in the kitchen.
Products need a strong sense of direction, something develop by committee decidedly lacks.