Linked by diegocg on Tue 19th Feb 2013 16:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553032
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Which one? I have never heard of one. There was one in btrfs, right, and btrs doesn't have a fsck, which makes corruption to its metadata much worse, but ext4 has been remarkably stable and reliable.
Regarding BTRFS, it still is surprisingly unstable, like e.g. just recently I tried to copy a few files from my N900 to my server running BTRFS and it resulted in the BTRFS - kernel module crashing every single time and me having to reboot the system to get it useable again. Such an odd bug, but I seem to keep hitting bugs with BTRFS all the time and I'm starting to wonder if I should just switch to something else.
FYI, BTRFS does have a fsck.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#When_will_Btrfs_have_a_f...
The bug was fixed in late October, so I would assume releases since then are patched.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=...
Yes, the October corruption thing (http://lwn.net/Articles/521022/) is gone.
Actually, an interesting read is how people, were too panicky about it: http://lwn.net/Articles/521803/





Member since:
2006-05-11
I hope this question isn't out of place here: Was the EXT4 corruption bug ever definitely fixed, and if so, in what version?