Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Feb 2013 11:40 UTC
This is amazing. Not only has Google just opened up the pre-order program for Google Glass to 'creative individuals', it has also unveiled what the user interface looks like and how it works. It's... Nothing short of amazing. I'm throwing money, credit cards, my car keys, my house keys, my Surface RT, my cats, everything at my screen. I want this so bad.
Thread beginning with comment 553243
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Cool, but could also be ridicule
by WereCatf on Wed 20th Feb 2013 18:25
in reply to "RE[4]: Cool, but could also be ridicule"
Member since:2006-02-15
I know people that wear contacts, not because how other people think about them, but because they don't like how they look with glasses on.
Yes, and in this case glasses don't suit their use-cases whereas contacts suit them better. I don't understand what you're really arguing about.
RE[6]: Cool, but could also be ridicule
by lucas_maximus on Wed 20th Feb 2013 18:31
in reply to "RE[5]: Cool, but could also be ridicule"
Member since:2009-08-18
I wouldn't wear the damn glasses because I might get mugged because I am wearing them.
Others would have their mates rip it out of them (and yes I do care what my friends think about me, otherwise they wouldn't be my friends).
There are a multitude of reasons why you wouldn't wear them and they are vaguely related to how other people think or perceive you.
It isn't as simple as you make it out to be.
It doesn't boil down everytime to "haters will be haters" for everyone. It might do for you and that is fine ... but it doesn't for me and a lot of people I know and the way that is talked about like it wholly negative thing when it isn't, which is what I was taking issue with.
Edited 2013-02-20 18:40 UTC
RE[5]: Cool, but could also be ridicule
by JLF65 on Wed 20th Feb 2013 18:28
in reply to "RE[4]: Cool, but could also be ridicule"
Member since:2005-07-06
Yes, it is. Some of us already wear glasses, and while some people will ridicule you for doing so, WE HAVE NO CHOICE. So we wore them anyway, and guess what? It's not really so bad. The people who will ridicule you are not people you want to associate with in any case. So those of us wearing glasses will have no problem at all wearing Google Glasses. Those of you who don't wear glasses, take it from us - it's not that bad, really. We should know.
RE[6]: Cool, but could also be ridicule
by lucas_maximus on Wed 20th Feb 2013 18:32
in reply to "RE[5]: Cool, but could also be ridicule"
Member since:2009-08-18
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
"Microsoft has sensationally abandoned its controversial plans to restrict the sharing of XBox One games, and has also removed daily online authentication requirements for its forthcoming console", reports The Guardian. They had no choice. Still a good move.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
"A snippet of code in the Steam digital distribution platform has revealed that Valve may be planning to let users easily share their games with friends in the future. The Verge has verified the code's authenticity, which was originally spotted by a member of the NeoGAF gaming forum; the code references a 'shared game library' and a notification that would alert a user when their games are currently in use by a borrower." This would change the, uh, game.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Official Apple statement on PRISM and privacy: "Regardless of the circumstances, our Legal team conducts an evaluation of each request and, only if appropriate, we retrieve and deliver the narrowest possible set of information to the authorities. In fact, from time to time when we see inconsistencies or inaccuracies in a request, we will refuse to fulfill it." This is basically Apple re-publishing their earlier statement in a more official manner. You either believe it, or you don't.
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
The open source Contiki operating system and its commercial Thingsquare distribution are making strides towards the connected home. According to a Computerworld article, a new LED light bulb manufacturer is putting small computers into their light bulbs. Each computer runs the Contiki OS, which gives each bulb an IP address and allows them to be controlled with a smartphone application. To connect the bulbs to the application, the bulbs use both Wi-Fi and the much lower power IEEE 802.15.4 mesh technology.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
"Google asked the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court on Tuesday to ease long-standing gag orders over data requests it makes, arguing that the company has a constitutional right to speak about information it's forced to give the government. The legal filing, which cites the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech, is the latest move by the California-based tech giant to protect its reputation in the aftermath of news reports about sweeping National Security Agency surveillance of Internet traffic." Draining the ditch after the cow has drowned in it.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
"I can't find one person who has been using the Nexus 7 for an extended period of time, and hasn't seen a massive downgrade in performance. Just what kind of downgrade are we talking here? I cannot pick up my Nexus 7 without experiencing problems like a lag of ten seconds, or more, just to rotate the display; touches refusing to acknowledged; stuttering notification panel actions; and unresponsive apps." Fully and utterly agreed. My Nexus 7 was blazing-fast and awesome for a few months, and at some point, it just started sucking. Just like that. I've tried loads of ROMs, and nothing helps.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
A new release of the hobby operating system MenuetOS! The release notes are a bit non-descript, but you'll have to take what you can get: "updates and improvements (picview, httpc, ehci, ...)".
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
"The Internet is one of the most transformative technologies of our lifetimes. But for 2 out of every 3 people on earth, a fast, affordable Internet connection is still out of reach. And this is far from being a solved problem. There are many terrestrial challenges to Internet connectivity - jungles, archipelagos, mountains. There are also major cost challenges. Right now, for example, in most of the countries in the southern hemisphere, the cost of an Internet connection is more than a month's income. Solving these problems isn't simply a question of time: it requires looking at the problem of access from new angles. So today we're unveiling our latest moonshot from Google[x]: balloon-powered Internet access." Insane.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
"MineAssemble is a tiny bootable Minecraft clone written partly in x86 assembly. I made it first and foremost because a university assignment required me to implement a game in assembly for a computer systems course. Because I had never implemented anything more complex than a 'Hello World' bootloader before, I decided I wanted to learn about writing my own kernel code at the same time. Note that the goal of this project was not to write highly efficient hand-optimized assembly code, but rather to have fun and write code that balances readability and speed. This is primarily accomplished by proper commenting and consistent code structuring." Just cool.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Jon Rubinstein, former CEO of Palm: "Well, I'm not sure I would have sold the company to HP. That's for sure. Talk about a waste. Not that I had any choice because when you sell a company you don't get to decide that. Obviously, the board and shareholders decide that. If we had known they were just going to shut it down and never really give it a chance to flourish, what would have been the point of selling the company? I think the deal we had with Verizon really hurt us, but who knew that at the time? These things are all hindsight."More News »
Sponsored Links
Member since:
2009-08-18
No it isn't. You are over simplifying it.
I know people that wear contacts, not because how other people think about them, but because they don't like how they look with glasses on.
And that is one example, I can think up off the top of my head. I am sure there are others specific examples I could remember given time.
I really think a lot of nerds/geeks whatever we wanna call ourselves have a real misconception about why people choose products.
Edited 2013-02-20 18:21 UTC