To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think Blue will probably share a lot in common with the 98 to 98SE transition, apparently it was a $20 update for Windows 98 owners - a slightly wider net of changes than a service pack, but not enough to result in a visible name change.
I am a happy Windows 8 user for the improvements in speed and I quite like the live tiles - but certainly have issues with crashing in metro apps and there's a lot of functionality to be desired in Mail - though it is now my default email client because of how much I like notifications in Windows 8; same reason I use Xbox Music over my preferred Zune.
I'm interested though how Blue will fit with enterprise - a yearly update strategy makes no sense when we're only now seeing businesses start to move to Windows 7.
Businesses were skipping out anyway because they just completed Win7 transitions (and thank God, XP needs to go.).
I think things will work same as before. 3 year schedule for major releases with yearly maintenance updates.
Businesses can choose to target a major release if they'd like, or if they're unhappy with the OS, wait until an interim update or the next major release. If anything it provides more flexibility.





Member since:
2005-12-04
Note what happened prior to XP: between 1998 and 2001 we had 98, 98SE, ME, 2000 and XP - five releases, four years.
What Vista really represented was accumulating all of that change into one very disruptive release rather than issuing change incrementally. Staying on XP represented the "calm before the storm" as it were.