To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You say distributing underage porn when the definition of barely legal implies legality and has nothing to do with child porn?
W.
T.
F?
So the SOPA/PIPA/etc seem like a good idea as well? You know, if it's for unsubstantiated quasi-legal reasoning. with no recourse for allowing legitimate traffic through.
I can't wait till they start deleting emails from google or microsoft accounts because there could be something they aren't aware of inside the email...
Edited 2013-02-26 22:26 UTC
No, it's *not* understandable. Prohibiting underage porn, yes. But "barely legal" is *still* legal. Assuming that one automatically implying the other is dishonest and says more about the one who uses the argument than the people accused. And it's *not* Apples' job to play the nanny for their users!
Edited 2013-02-27 01:01 UTC




Member since:
2012-11-05
As much as I loathe this from a privacy perspective, the fact that they are storing your emails on their servers (and the legal issues with their then potentially being complicit in distributing underage porn) means that this is somewhat forgivable.