Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Feb 2013 22:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 553953
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: there is nothing wrong with the hardware
by lucas_maximus on Thu 28th Feb 2013 18:56
in reply to "RE[3]: there is nothing wrong with the hardware"
RE[5]: there is nothing wrong with the hardware
by woegjiub on Fri 1st Mar 2013 06:46
in reply to "RE[4]: there is nothing wrong with the hardware"
I've never had that problem; it works fine even for my parter, who for some reason refuses to close tabs, and normally has over 200 open on a windows box.
Problem sites *will* crash the browser, but you just don't open that tab when you reload the browser - they load on demand, so when the browser restarts, only one tab will actually load.
Differing experiences and all, but this is with only two tabs open, and every extra tab increases chromium's usage by a lot more than it does firefox's - it's pretty much as close as they ever come in usage for me.
http://img541.imageshack.us/img541/6753/rams.png





Member since:
2005-09-21
You were saying? (I have 6 chrome Windows Open).
Also process isolation is a good idea, because when one tab locks up/crashes I just have to reload the tab. I am sure there are a host of other reason why it is a good idea.
You failed to add up all the chrome processes or give any details about how you tested this. That's kind of the point of "process-separation", there are multiple processes.