Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Mar 2013 19:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554202
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Read that quote
by andrewclunn on Tue 5th Mar 2013 20:08
in reply to "RE[3]: Read that quote"
Thanks for the info:
EDIT -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hoUmCZjca4




Member since:
2010-09-13
Wrong - it's not legal, but illegal to unlock an off-contract phone.
That's why the change in policy is a big deal.
Look people are always confused on this issue, I don't know why.
Nothing changes your contract. If you owe an ETF to leave early - you owe it.
Nobody is saying that you can unlock a phone and that somehow eliminates your obligations to pay for the phone.
That's what never happened - ever - when there was an DMCA exemption, and today - currently there is not one.
You always had to pay the carrier back for the subsidized phone.
But what the DMCA is now doing, now that the exemption no longer exists, is actually criminalizing the act of unlocking a phone.
Doesn't matter about the contract - in fact, never did, that was always a non-issue.