Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Mar 2013 10:35 UTC
Legal "Apple vs. Samsung initially ended with a billion-dollar verdict in favor of Apple, but there have been plenty of wrinkles since. This week brought about another, as Nokia filed an amicus brief on behalf of Apple, Inc. in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In the brief filed Monday, Nokia asked the court to permit permanent injunctions on the sale of Samsung phones that were found to infringe Apple's patents." In the meantime, the latest comScore figures for the US show that Windows Phone's market share actually declined during the launch of Windows Phone 8. It's pretty clear that, combined with the disappointing quarterly results for Nokia, the company is setting itself up for the future. In this future, Nokia's patent portfolio is worth more than their actual phone business, and as such, Nokia can't do anything but support Apple in this case, else the value of their portfolio goes down.
Thread beginning with comment 554562
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: WHAT?!?
by Valhalla on Thu 7th Mar 2013 22:30 UTC in reply to "RE: WHAT?!?"
Member since:

He's laughed at by everyone except Nokia haters and apparently OSNews. He's not insightful, influential, or even right.

Well he was featured as the the number one Top 10 Power Influencers in Mobile in Forbes magazine.

Of course the reason you are attacking him is all because he is saying things you don't want to hear, which is that Microsoft's mobile efforts are doing really poor.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: WHAT?!?
by Nelson on Thu 7th Mar 2013 22:44 in reply to "RE[2]: WHAT?!?"
Nelson Member since:

Was. He no longer holds that position.

In fact, he's not even Top 10 anymore. People are recognizing him for the joke that he's become. Its tragic. In an ironic twist though, the most influential person is the guy that runs MyNokiaBlog.

Instead of attacking me, read the links I've posted. Specifically the first one, which shows his various inaccuracies. He's grossly misleading.

Edited 2013-03-07 22:46 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: WHAT?!?
by Valhalla on Thu 7th Mar 2013 23:51 in reply to "RE[3]: WHAT?!?"
Valhalla Member since:

Oh please, neither you nor the person who created that blog (is it you?) would have spent time attacking his claims if he was not influental.

You liked what he wrote until he started writing bad stuff about Microsoft's mobile efforts, then suddenly he is a hack.

I'm sorry but your objectivity regarding Microsoft has no credibility at all as far as I'm concerned.

Reply Parent Score: 1