Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Mar 2013 20:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554603
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Nelson
by jared_wilkes on Thu 7th Mar 2013 23:49
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Nelson"
I already acknowledged my error about sublicensees but was unable to edit it quick enough.
I'm unsure of the legalese necessary for Google to claim its royalty-free if they are paying the royalties themselves. If you want to think that's "free", that's fine. I will still classify it as paid for by Google.




Member since:
2006-01-24
What are you babbling about?
This agreement allows for Google to sublicense the techniques to any user of VP8, whether the VP8 implementation is by Google or another entity; this means that users can develop independent implementations of VP8 and still enjoy coverage under the sublicenses.
Google intends to license the techniques under terms that are in line with the W3C’s definition of a Royalty Free License. This definition can be found here: http://www.w3.org/2001/07/SVG10-IPR-statements We anticipate having the sublicense ready in the next few weeks. The terms will appear on the WebM Project website at http://webmproject.org
By using vp8 you become a sub-licencee, under the terms of w3c's royalty free licence.