Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Mar 2013 20:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554635
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Comment by Nelson
by jared_wilkes on Fri 8th Mar 2013 02:02
in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by Nelson"




Member since:
2011-04-25
Also, your absurd ellipses of my quote is evident: I said: it's not free, because it is underwritten by Google. You contorted my statement to make it appear that I was saying that it was not free because it is patent encumbered. Two separate statements.