Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Mar 2013 16:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554738
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"right now I'm attacking it because of the copyright assignment requirement for contributing to their projects
So funny you say that, cause you have to have to do the same if you want to contribute to Qt "
Qt makes some sense because it has a commercial version and it would make quite the mess when contributions cannot flow into the commercial version: you don't want the two to stray apart too far.
GNU, on the other hand.... but it looks like they're starting to loosen up too ( http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html )
"Starting to loosen up" is simply a display of ignorance, that has ALWAYS been the case for GNU software. People are acting like it's something new, but it is really all they can find to try to argue against Ubuntu. I know this from personal experience because I have tried to make this argument in trying to justify why Canonical are bad.
In truth, there is no good argument, everything they are doing is justifiable right now. People are resisting change, and are focused on their particular interests rather than the bigger picture. Granted Canonical isn't making it very easy to look at the bigger picture, but it is surprising the backlash that has come when they actually tried to clue us in.





Member since:
2005-09-27
So funny you say that, cause you have to have to do the same if you want to contribute to Qt, and yet, I don't seen anybody bitching about it.
and about the NIH syndrome, please, what project doesn't do that? cut the hypocrisy.
Edited 2013-03-08 18:28 UTC