Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 13:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 554983
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Sun 10th Mar 2013 16:38
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Nelson"
RE[8]: Comment by Nelson
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 10th Mar 2013 16:43
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Nelson"
"
It's a list of companies that support WebM/VP8, and therefore, will not sue anyone for using it. Call it what you will, but the effective outcome is the same.
It's a list of companies that support WebM/VP8, and therefore, will not sue anyone for using it. Call it what you will, but the effective outcome is the same.
That's a herculean leap. "
Considering loads of companies already implement VP8 in hardware (TI, Nvidia, Samsung, and more), there's no leap at all. Just plain reality.





Member since:
2005-06-29
It's a list of companies that support WebM/VP8, and therefore, will not sue anyone for using it. Call it what you will, but the effective outcome is the same.
That list contains virtually all chip makers (except Intel), but even Intel supports VP8 because it's building Android smartphones. The cold and harsh truth is that VP8 has tremendous industry support - support most technologies can only dream of.