Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th Mar 2013 23:27 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 555404
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The lack of investment by browser vendors into native built-in RSS readers is what has pushed users into using Facebook as their one and only news aggregating site, and look at what power that's placed in Facebook's hands and taken away from the browser vendors.
And Google would probably love if some of that power went into Google+ ...maybe that's also why Google Reader is no longer desirable?





Member since:
2005-11-10
I had an argument with Mozilla over their own dis-interest in RSS. This may be worth reading to some, Google falls in line with everything that's being said; browser vendors don't care about RSS because they have stopped caring about the individual user.
http://camendesign.com/rss_is_dying
http://camendesign.com/rss_a_reply
The lack of investment by browser vendors into native built-in RSS readers is what has pushed users into using Facebook as their one and only news aggregating site, and look at what power that's placed in Facebook's hands and taken away from the browser vendors.
The next thing to die due to browser vendor apathy is e-mail. Watch this space.