Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Mar 2013 22:17 UTC
Apple Apple's Phil Shiller has been trash-talking Android in the press these past few days - just as Samsung is about to launch its Galaxy S4. "Public, preemptive slamming of a competitor is far outside Apple's PR wheelhouse; it's a dramatic shift for a company used to making news rather than reacting to it. But why is it happening?" The Verge hits the nail on the head: "Cupertino's behavior this week is yet another symptom of Samsung's stratospheric rise in the smartphone market globally, a rise that challenges Apple and has outright stifled Android competitors like HTC and Sony."
Thread beginning with comment 555554
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

They aren't cheap, but they aren't that expensive if you look at what you get.

That said, if you're not sure what you are getting it's a risky gamble financial wise. It kept me away from iMacs and iPods before I got an iMac G5 for free and even then I wasn't blown away by Panther, but Tiger did make the experience a good one.

Most people can probably manage quite fine without a Mac and Apple seems contend with ruling the upper segment and isn't interested in selling something cheap 'n' affordable for the masses.

Reply Parent Score: 2

moondevil Member since:

At the time my post refers to, the minimum age was around 300€, a PC could be bought with a base price of 800€ and the macs base price was around 1500€.

Which type family would get a Mac?

Reply Parent Score: 4

MOS6510 Member since:

A rich one I guess. And businesses.

But that's why I mentioned that the iMac never was/is the success the iPod, iPhone and iPad were/are: for most people it was too expensive.

I could afford one in 1998, but I was in to Windows and Linux, not seeing a need for one and only tried it when I could get one for free.

For Apple, despite not selling loads, it was/is a success as they turn in a nice profit.

Reply Parent Score: 2