Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Mar 2013 12:49 UTC
Google "Google's Chrome and Android operating systems will remain separate products but could have more overlap, Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt said, a week after the two came under a single boss." That's that, then.
Thread beginning with comment 556090
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: At least
by Nelson on Thu 21st Mar 2013 23:02 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: At least"
Nelson
Member since:
2005-11-29


So long as Google is the default search engine and Admob (I think it's called) is the preferred API for service in-app adverts, then I don't think it matters too much if vendors do load their own services.


If Samsung has the guts to run their own app store infrastructure, then setting up or buying out an existing advertising solution for developers isn't that impossible.

Apple did it with iAd. Nokia did it with NAX which is just an exchange network.

As far as search, there are plenty of alternatives to search. There's Bing, and then there are new types of search up and coming like that from Facebook's Graph which searching a different type of data.

Google is becoming increasingly replaceable in Android and it definitely is cause for concern.


Google make money from their online services. It doesn't really make much sense for them to go the way of Apple and have a their OS's limited to their own hardware.


It does if they want to have a leash on their OEMs. Look at Microsoft with the Surface.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: At least
by swift11 on Fri 22nd Mar 2013 05:06 in reply to "RE[4]: At least"
swift11 Member since:
2012-08-23

Google is becoming increasingly replaceable in Android and it definitely is cause for concern.

I don't consider this as a "cause for concern", far from it.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: At least
by Nelson on Fri 22nd Mar 2013 05:39 in reply to "RE[5]: At least"
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

Thanks. You completely changed my mind.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: At least
by Laurence on Fri 22nd Mar 2013 16:07 in reply to "RE[4]: At least"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

You've raised some interesting points, but most of them aren't related to my post at all:

If Samsung has the guts to run their own app store infrastructure, then setting up or buying out an existing advertising solution for developers isn't that impossible.

I didn't say it was impossible. In fact I didn't even comment on whether it was likely or not. I just said Google care more about getting advertising revenue than what skins vendors modify their ROMs with.

As far as search, there are plenty of alternatives to search. There's Bing, and then there are new types of search up and coming like that from Facebook's Graph which searching a different type of data.

Totally. Though I never said that Google was the only search engine around. All I said was that Google care more about being the default search engine than what skins vendors modify their ROMs with.


Google is becoming increasingly replaceable in Android and it definitely is cause for concern.

Google were always replaceable in Android. That's never changed.

And it's not a cause for concern for anyone other than Google. Why should my mum or wife care if Bing or DDG is the default search engine or even who provides the mobile app ads? All they want is their apps to work.

It does if they want to have a leash on their OEMs. Look at Microsoft with the Surface.

That doesn't address my comment at all. If Google wanted to release their own hardware then they wouldn't be distributing Android to OEMs to begin with. Plus you can have a leash on your OEMs without releasing your own hardware anyway.

However that's all moot because Google doesn't really care about what crap OEMs add to Android just so long as Google's advertising and search services stay connected.

People keep comparing Google to Microsoft in terms of Android and Windows. However that comparison doesn't really work because Windows is Microsoft's product, where as Google created Android drive more traffic to Google's ads and search. Thus Android isn't Google's product as such, it's more a facilitator for Google's products.

Reply Parent Score: 2