Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Mar 2013 21:09 UTC
Legal Late last week, Nokia dropped what many consider to be a bomb on the WebM project: a list of patents that VP8 supposedly infringes in the form of an IETF IPR declaration. The list has made the rounds around the web, often reported as proof that VP8 infringes upon Nokia's patents. All this stuff rang a bell. Haven't we been here before? Yup, we have, with another open source codec called Opus. Qualcomm and Huawei made the same claims as Nokia did, but they turned out to be complete bogus. As it turns out, this is standard practice in the dirty business of the patent licensing industry.
Thread beginning with comment 556651
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Big picture...
by Radio on Tue 26th Mar 2013 10:35 UTC in reply to "RE: Big picture..."
Member since:

So, h.265, a codec developed and owned by major companies who are willing to earn royalties from it and lock competition out, is likely to become widespread? What a surprise!

And how lucky we are, us, end-users! Corporations know what is best for us! Let us prosternate in deference! Please milk me.

Reply Parent Score: 4