Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Mar 2013 21:09 UTC
Legal Late last week, Nokia dropped what many consider to be a bomb on the WebM project: a list of patents that VP8 supposedly infringes in the form of an IETF IPR declaration. The list has made the rounds around the web, often reported as proof that VP8 infringes upon Nokia's patents. All this stuff rang a bell. Haven't we been here before? Yup, we have, with another open source codec called Opus. Qualcomm and Huawei made the same claims as Nokia did, but they turned out to be complete bogus. As it turns out, this is standard practice in the dirty business of the patent licensing industry.
Thread beginning with comment 556788
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Big picture...
by lemur2 on Wed 27th Mar 2013 05:38 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Big picture..."
lemur2
Member since:
2007-02-17

"VP8 is not inferior in performance to h.264 except for just one factor: encoding speed. In every other respect VP8 can match or exceed h.264 performance.


This is rubbish.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VP8

In a comparison done in May 2011, the libvpx encoder was found to be slow compared to common H.264 encoders and used up to 213% more data for the same quality video, when used in videoconferencing applications.


over twice as much data! So obviously it is not as good.
"

Way, way, way out of date.

You can catch up a bit here, if you care to:
http://blog.webmproject.org/

Reply Parent Score: 1