Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 23rd Apr 2013 14:18 UTC
Games "Why has the SimCity story gone away? It's a good question. And the answer for it reveals much about how both the games industry, and the games journalism industry, work." Telling - not just for the game journalism, but all of it. As a sidenote, you can always rely on Rock Paper Shotgun to bring the best gaming news. Under-appreciated gem of online news reporting.
Thread beginning with comment 559573
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

My point is that it's just a lousy video game and if you feel so screwed over for buying it, then go and get your money back instead of trying to turn this into some form of social movement. And if you spent your last penny on this game and are you're now so financially broken by the purchase then you need to re-examine your priorities. That's my point.

For what it's worth I absolutely agree with you, however there are three groups of people that simply do not listen to reason: gamers, socialists, and the religious. Don't waste your breath. If these fools do not realize that they will continue to be screwed until they stop buying the crap and thus volunteering to be screwed, they deserve everything coming to them. They can't screw you if you don't buy. It's that simple. If you continue to buy from a company like EA that has a known history of ass-raping its customers, you shouldn't come bitching when it happens. You knew it, you bought it, so you get what you bought. End of story. If you'd use your brains instead of your keyboard and mouse, perhaps you all would not be bawling about being screwed and would be just a little more intelligent about purchasing products in the future. Take it as a life lesson learned, and do please at least try to learn from it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

lucas_maximus Member since:

It is not a call to arms mate.

It is entertainment. If you are worried you might not like it, let early adopters and journalists try it for you and then you can choose based on their feedback whether it is worth it or not.

This is a sensible way of buying things and doesn't require a call to arms. It called being sensible and being a bit wise.

While you guys like to preach to the choir, most intelligent people either try before they buy or they listen to other people's experiences and make a judgement afters.

Some like to take the risk and be early adopters. That fine if you one of those, but a lot of people aren't.

Edited 2013-04-23 18:28 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

franksands Member since:

You know what? It is a call to arms. There's an abysmal difference between being an earlier adopter and expecting a few bugs in the game and being lied to your face. The worst part is that this is not the first time this fiasco happens. EA should have learned with what happened with Diablo III, for example.
EA had a rough estimate on the number of players based on the number of pre-orders. But why should they care? They already have the customers money on their pocket.
When I buy something I expected it delivered as advertised, the moment I bought it, not months later.

Reply Parent Score: 3