Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 11th May 2013 21:41 UTC
Windows "Windows is indeed slower than other operating systems in many scenarios, and the gap is worsening." That's one way to start an insider explanation of why Windows' performance isn't up to snuff. Written by someone who actually contributes code to the Windows NT kernel, the comment on Hacker News, later deleted but reposted with permission on Marc Bevand's blog, paints a very dreary picture of the state of Windows development. The root issue? Think of how Linux is developed, and you'll know the answer.
Thread beginning with comment 561501
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
unclefester
Member since:
2007-01-13

You are most welcome. I should also add that the market really likes Linux. That is why despite being free Linux has a 1% market share. Because it is so awesome.

Or wait...

Does Linux have a 1% market share because it is so awesome or is it because people like myself are too stupid too see the awesome that is Linux? Isn't the prevailing view of Linux users that ordinary people are just too dumb too understand how amazing Linux is?

Yes, you are too smart and too cleaver for the rest of us. Isn't it wonderful up on that high horse mate?



Linux has only 1% marketshare on desktops and laptops because Microsoft coerces manufacturers into installing Windows.

However in markets where MS has little or no leverage - servers, supercomputers, embedded devices, phones and tablets Linux has been a spectacular success [and MS a spectacular failure].

In fact sometime in the next 2-4 years Linux (Android) will be the best selling OS as portable devices begin to replace most desktops and laptops.

Reply Parent Score: 3

lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

"You are most welcome. I should also add that the market really likes Linux. That is why despite being free Linux has a 1% market share. Because it is so awesome.

Or wait...

Does Linux have a 1% market share because it is so awesome or is it because people like myself are too stupid too see the awesome that is Linux? Isn't the prevailing view of Linux users that ordinary people are just too dumb too understand how amazing Linux is?

Yes, you are too smart and too cleaver for the rest of us. Isn't it wonderful up on that high horse mate?



Linux has only 1% marketshare on desktops and laptops because Microsoft coerces manufacturers into installing Windows.

However in markets where MS has little or no leverage - servers, supercomputers, embedded devices, phones and tablets Linux has been a spectacular success [and MS a spectacular failure].

In fact sometime in the next 2-4 years Linux (Android) will be the best selling OS as portable devices begin to replace most desktops and laptops.
"

Indeed, Android uses a Linux kernel, and it is easily the best selling OS on mobile phones. It has also recently just about caught up with iOS on tablets.

http://www.androidcentral.com/survey-says-android-claims-48-us-tabl...

Linux is the most popular OS for supercomputers, embedded in devices such as TVs, DVDs, PVRs, e-readers etc, even in cars, in network infrastructure such as routers, in servers, in render farms, and in server farms such as used by Google and Facebook.

Even for desktops, Linux ships currently on about 5% of machines sold.

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA5ODM

Given all this coverage, over the whole of the computing market Linux is actually the majority OS of the computing world.

Oh, and given that many ordinary people in western countries own a car, a phone or tablet or both, a TV, a DVD player, a PVR, perhaps a separate GPS, maybe an e-reader, a wifi router and ADSL modem, and also a desktop or laptop ... then such an ordinary person is likely to be running about five times as many copies of Linux as copies of Windows.

Edited 2013-05-14 08:21 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

lucas_maximus Member since:
2009-08-18

Android != Desktop Linux.

It is like me including Windows CE PDAs and POS machines in Windows market share.

While Android is Linux based, the underlying kernel could have been anything. Linux is one component of what makes Android.

Reply Parent Score: 3