Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Fri 4th Nov 2005 23:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 56290
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
"This need for a 'fsck' is a liability since it means that system is still unusable for a time once you try to bring it back up."
Actually, we've got background fsck for a very long time now. ie, the system isn't stuck doing the fsck on boot.