Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Nov 2005 17:51 UTC, submitted by AdriAn Avila
Thread beginning with comment 56670
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
And what makes you think that TrollTech and KDE couln't be demanded for Microsoft? MS have the patent for many litle thinks that everyone use including TrollTech and KDE
Right now, there are no known patents violation in Qt/KDE. If you know something we don't know, tell us.
Meanwhile, Mono is CLEARLY violating specific patents (ASP.NET, ADO.NET and Windows.Forms as written on the Mono website). There's a difference.
Novell can defend it self with its own patents.
Microsoft can decide to sue Novell AND the companies using Mono for their projects. I bet noone wants to deal with Microsoft lawyers. At least, noone with a sane mind.