Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Aug 2013 20:34 UTC
Legal The Obama administration:

After extensive consultations with the agencies of the Trade Policy Staff Committee and the Trade Policy Review Group, as well as other interested agencies and persons, I have decided to disapprove the USITC's determination to issue an exclusion order and cease and desist order in this investigation.

Lots of talk about SEPs and FRAND in Obama's decree, which means that the Obama administration contradicts everything the ITC has said. To freshen your memory, the ITC ruled that not only was the patent in question not a standard essential patent, but Samsung's offer was actually proper FRAND:

Additionally, the Commission found that there were still disputed issues concerning the patent at issue was even actually essential to the standard (and therefore whether a FRAND or disclosure obligation applied at all).

[...]

The Commission analyzed the history of negotiations between Apple and Samsung (this portion is heavily redacted) to see if Apple showed that Samsung failed to negotiate “in good faith,” and found that Apple failed to do so. Notably, the Commission dismissed Apple’s arguments that (1) Samsung’s initial offer was so high as to show bad faith, and (2) Samsung’s attempts to get a cross-license to Apple’s non-SEPs violated its FRAND commitments.

In other words, the Obama administration threw out virtually everything the ITC has said in order to protect Apple. This effectively means that American companies can infringe on non-American companies' (standard essential) patents all they want, because the president will simply step in if they try to fight back.

So, I was wrong. I expected the Obama administration to be impartial and not give such a huge slap in the face of the ITC - as cynical as I usually am, I can still be naive. Protectionism is more important to the POTUS.

Thread beginning with comment 568846
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Is this really so bad?
by novad on Sun 4th Aug 2013 10:55 UTC
novad
Member since:
2010-06-10

Don't understand me wrong.
This veto is a shame for the US administration!

The ITC made a fair (Which was surprising) ruling and everyone had to accept it (Including Apple)

Is the veto surprising??? Certainly not. For those who heard about the EADS (Airbus) and Boeing war know already that the US plays dirty.

What is interesting is that this is a clear signal to every major actor in whatever domain all over the world. As long as you aren't a "danger" you're welcome in the US. If you have success .......

The problem with that is that this protects US companies in the US... What about the countries which have been affected by the US protectionism?

Will China (Huawei and many others) or India accept ITC rulings now? Well... I wouldn't.

I'll continue to follow what is reported here:
http://stats.areppim.com/stats/stats_mobiosxtime.htm

I think we'll see more and more difference between US and Worldwide curves

Reply Score: 4

RE: Is this really so bad?
by brichpmr on Sun 4th Aug 2013 11:53 in reply to "Is this really so bad?"
brichpmr Member since:
2006-04-22

What?? You don't think other countries employ protectionist rules and regs? What planet do you live on?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Is this really so bad?
by novad on Sun 4th Aug 2013 13:27 in reply to "RE: Is this really so bad?"
novad Member since:
2010-06-10

On the same planet as you. No need to be rude.

What I just say is that they play more dirtily than others.

US companies trials against other US companies are somehow interesting (Oracle / Google) but as soon as a foreign companies are in the game, even if they play with "US rules", the game is done in advance (Much more than in other democratic countries).

Every country tries to protect its economy, but this blatant move will just give a free pass for even more aggressive moves to anyone.

That's bad... For everyone

Typos edited

Edited 2013-08-04 13:43 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 7