Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Oct 2013 16:07 UTC
Benchmarks

With the exception of Apple and Motorola, literally every single OEM we've worked with ships (or has shipped) at least one device that runs this silly CPU optimization. It's possible that older Motorola devices might've done the same thing, but none of the newer devices we have on hand exhibited the behavior. It's a systemic problem that seems to have surfaced over the last two years, and one that extends far beyond Samsung.

Pathetic, but this has been going on in the wider industry for as long as I can remember - graphics chip makers come to mind, for instance. Still, this is clearly scumbag behaviour designed to mislead consumers.

On the other hand, if you buy a phone based on silly artificial benchmark scores, you deserve to be cheated.

Thread beginning with comment 573871
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
BushLin
Member since:
2011-01-26

"Tony" tried to misframe the argument.

I was talking about software optimisation in context and unfortunately "Tony" has a well documented history of fitting the stereotype I spoke of.

Are you "Tony" in disguise?

Reply Parent Score: 2

MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

Some are stereotype Apple fans, some are stereotype Apple haters.

At least Tony doesn't resort to insults and motivates his claims, but I guess that's part of that stereotype.

Reply Parent Score: 2

BushLin Member since:
2011-01-26

What was it you found insulting? Equating the excessive fanboyism I've witnessed on here to religious nuts OR the relevant point I made before you "all" weighed in with anything to distract from it?

Apple are not increasing the efficiency in the software of anything other than their current device. The widely accepted status quo is that Apple will cripple your previously buttery experience with a new OS and pretty much force you to upgrade because that's what brings them profit.


Every product I use and like has flaws, I like to acknowledge them as part of their assessment rather than go on a campaign on behalf of a company.

So when I say:
Oh god, I forgot what happens what you dare speak against the almighty fruit god.

and a new account signs up today using a strange reference to "Tony" in order to further distract, it just re-enforces an already well founded view.

So keep signing up, misframing and block voting; intelligent people see through it.

Edited 2013-10-04 20:08 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

TroubleFunk Member since:
2013-10-04

"Tony" tried to misframe the argument.

I was talking about software optimisation in context and unfortunately "Tony" has a well documented history of fitting the stereotype I spoke of.

Are you "Tony" in disguise?


I really don't think YOU should be accusing anyone of fitting a stereotype. You seem like some mindless Apple-hater.
I don't know what your history is but you fit that profile.

Reply Parent Score: 0

BushLin Member since:
2011-01-26

You seem like someone who'd rather create another profile than answer an uncomfortable question.

Here's my history:
http://www.osnews.com/user/BushLin/comments

Here's yours:

Username: TroubleFunk
Date Joined: 2013-10-04

Reply Parent Score: 2