Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th Oct 2013 21:47 UTC
Windows

Paul Thurrot has a number of rumours up about Windows Phone 8.1. Two stand out to me.

Where GDR3 is widely expected to support 5- to 6-inch screens, 8.1 will supposedly support 7- to 10-inch screens as well. This obviously infringes on Windows RT/8.x tablets, so it's not clear what the thinking is there.

So, Windows RT will become even more pointless than it already is.

Aping the iPhone navigation model, Microsoft will apparently remove the Back button from the Windows Phone hardware specification with 8.1. The Back button just doesn't make sense, I was told: Users navigate away from an app by pressing the Start button and then open a new app, just like they do on iPhone. And the "back stack" is ill-understood by users: Most don't realize what they're doing when they repeatedly hit the Back button.

This I am not happy with. The back button is my main navigational input in both Android and Windows Phone, and I miss it dearly in iOS.

I'm just hoping on performance improvements, still my biggest issue with Windows Phone. I used my HTC 8X for a few hours today, and I was stunned by just how slow everything is compared to Android 4.3. Of course, application quality is another huge issue, but there's little Microsoft can do to convince developers that their Windows Phone applications are more than just side projects done between serious work on Android and iOS.

Thread beginning with comment 574467
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Morgan
Member since:
2005-06-29

And once again, what I was saying was OS-agnostic. Bad hardware is bad hardware. I think you like to argue for the sake of arguing, common sense be damned.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

The point is that you can't tell because you haven't used the OS, chalking it up to bad hardware attributes an altruistic trait onto reduz (despite his identical rants on every Windows Phone post) and explains it away as "bad hardware" and not malicious and dishonest exaggerations of a smaller "problem".

If I thought it was a hardware problem I'd probably mention it, but the combination of what I brought up above along with the comment posting history of the OP would seen to imply otherwise.

This isn't a team game, there are no factions, and if I thought I needed someone to interject with a weaker point I'd ask. I have no problem calling a liar a liar, and in reduz's case the shoe more than fits without a cop out like "bad hardware".

I'm sorry if you felt offended, but it is the truth. I don't pretend to speak on the experiences with an OS I've never used and neither should you, especially when your past WP7 usage biases your opinion and skews it towards "bad hardware" rather than "idiot poster".

Reply Parent Score: 3

Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

There's obviously a disconnect here, and climbing back up through the thread I see it's my fault. I was trying to reply to Dano's comment "You must have a lemon. What phone model do you have?" and instead replied to you. So, sorry about that.

However, I stand behind my assertion that bad hardware can cause a perception of bad software, no matter the platform. Telling me I'm wrong about that shows a flawed and extremely narrow point of view on your part.

Reply Parent Score: 2