Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Oct 2013 15:04 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless

Nokia has just announced its Q3 2013 financial results, revealing an operating profit of EUR118 million ($162 million) from EUR 5.66 billion ($7.8 billion) revenue. That's up massively year over year, but nonetheless represents another quarter of middling results. The report is the first since Microsoft agreed to purchase Nokia's phone business, and that division - Devices and Services - performed as expected, posting a small loss of EUR 86 million ($118 million).

So, Microsoft is buying the part of Nokia that is losing money, while the parts that make money remain in Finland. Seems like a good deal for Nokia-proper. In the meantime, Microsoft will be saddled with a devices division that is still losing money, and whose increase in sales consists largely of low-end, low-margin devices (like the 520). Interesting - especially since Windows Phone was supposed to prevent Nokia participating in a race to the bottom. I'm sure Microsoft's super-successful Surface division welcomes Nokia's devices division.

The cold truth: even more than 2.5 years after announcing the switch to Windows Phone, Nokia's Lumia range still cannot make up for drop in sales of Symbian devices and feature phones. This is roughly the same timeframe in which Samsung rose to the top. With Android.

Read into that what you will.

Thread beginning with comment 575806
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by Nelson
by tylerdurden on Wed 30th Oct 2013 19:13 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Nelson"
tylerdurden
Member since:
2009-03-17

People, who are interested in actually understanding an issue, are aware that context is crucial in order to understand what numbers and figures reflect about a specific situation/event.

Unsurprisingly, those with astroturfing narratives as their primary motivation tend to consider the actual contexts of their (marketing) figures to be "red herrings," for they may detract from the PR effect of said numbers.


From your response it's rather easy to tell on which camp you reside.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[7]: Comment by Nelson
by Nelson on Wed 30th Oct 2013 19:33 in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by Nelson"
Nelson Member since:
2005-11-29

Like I mentioned, it depends on if you think Nokia has some out of the ordinary trait that would make gargantuan shipment increases possible. The amount of volume they'd need to both offset and then improve on Symbian's past volumes are astronomical.

No OEM is currently exhibiting growth patterns like that save for the market leaders. Unless you expected Windows Phone to catapult them overnight to market leadership (insane if you thought it was possible from either WP or Android), Nokia's current growth trajectory is fantastic.

They're growing faster than other Android OEMs at comparable volumes and seeing a stabilizing financial situation.

You can call it PR, or Astroturfing or whatever uncreative name you toss out next, but this is exactly what I've been saying would happen. Apparently this quarter I was especially on target.

The Always Wrong Club moniker may annoy you, but its an accurate depiction of some on this website.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[8]: Comment by Nelson
by tylerdurden on Wed 30th Oct 2013 23:28 in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by Nelson"
tylerdurden Member since:
2009-03-17

Dude, what are you going on about? You were right about a couple of figures without any context, which you keep trying to use as some kind of vindicated analysis. When in reality Microsoft had to bail out at significant expense Nokia's device division, because after 3 years of partnership their biggest WP OEM did not manage to turn a single profit.

You keep repeating your script over and over, trying to turn a clear sign of desperation about being squeezed out of a strategic market, into some kind of managerial tour de force.

I just hope you ain't doing all this astroturfing for Micronokia on a pro bono basis, that would be exceedingly sad.

LOL.

Reply Parent Score: 4