Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Dec 2013 13:40 UTC
Windows

The Verge is reporting that Microsoft is considering making Windows RT and Windows Phone free for OEMs, to combat Android.

We understand that any decision to axe the license fees for Windows Phone and Windows RT would be backed by a push for revenue from Microsoft’s apps and services. Microsoft has been experimenting with ads in Windows 8 apps, and any associated revenue from those apps and the company’s built-in Bing search results would help offset the lack of license fees. Microsoft would also push consumers to subscribe to services like SkyDrive, Office, and Skype for additional revenue.

So, let me get this straight. In April this year, a Microsoft-sponsored antitrust complaint about Android had this to say:

Google's predatory distribution of Android at below-cost makes it difficult for other providers of operating systems to recoup investments in competing with Google's dominant mobile platform.

And we have the whole Scroogled campaign (I felt dirty just for visiting that site).

And now they're considering doing the exact same things they claim Google is doing unfairly? Does this company have any internal consistency whatsoever?

Thread beginning with comment 578490
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Consistency
by crystall on Wed 11th Dec 2013 15:15 UTC
crystall
Member since:
2007-02-06

They're actually quite consistent: they're out to make money, no matter how. They've just been not very good at it since they had to face some actual competition.

Reply Score: 7

RE: Consistency
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Wed 11th Dec 2013 17:01 in reply to "Consistency"
Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:
2006-07-14

True this. Its a bit naive to think that a company actually believes its own advertising, marketing and public statements. They believe what ever will make them the most profit ( not that being profit focused is a bad thing for a companies senior management).

Reply Parent Score: 5