Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 31st Mar 2014 21:08 UTC
Legal

The Verge, summarising the first US patent lawsuit between Apple and Samsung:

Apple was awarded just over $1 billion in damages, though that figure was later cut down to $939.8 million after the judge pointed out errors in the way the jury did its math. Those damages were retried, and came in lower than the original figure, though the entire amount has since been appealed, and Samsung hasn't paid a penny. Alongside that, Apple and Samsung failed to win bans against one another's products in the US, making the first trial seem like nothing more than a legal spectacle.

Or, just call it what it is: an abject failure on both company's sides, and a huge waste of money that could have gone to product development, higher salaries, or even shareholder returns. Two gigantic and hugely profitable companies using despicable weaponry - and all, for, nothing.

But in the midst of all that was a very real threat: another lawsuit, one that targeted more successful devices from both companies, and used easy-to-understand patents covering basic software features. Apple filed it against Samsung in February 2012, targeting 17 devices. Samsung responded in kind, and this week the pair go head to head once again; the outcome could be very different. Here's what to expect over the next weeks and months as these two titans clash again in California's courts.

So, prepare for another week of lawyers laughing all the way to the bank, while two companies with more money than they know what to do with waste precious time of the US justice system that could be spent elsewhere, and better.

Let the cheering contest continue. Which faceless corporation that cares none about you do you root for?

Thread beginning with comment 585619
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Rooting for Samsung
by petedude on Mon 31st Mar 2014 21:54 UTC
petedude
Member since:
2006-03-14

Here they were, minding their own business when Apple decided to play bully. "If you can't out-innovate, out-ligitate" plain and simple.

Also partly why I've cut back on purchases of Apple products over the last few years.

Reply Score: 4

RE: Rooting for Samsung
by themwagency on Mon 31st Mar 2014 23:58 in reply to "Rooting for Samsung"
themwagency Member since:
2013-03-06

"If you can't out-innovate, out-ligitate"


One can (and in my opinion) should make the counter argument which is that if you can't out-innovate, copy. That's what Samsung tried and will likely have to pay the piper for.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Rooting for Samsung
by kwan_e on Tue 1st Apr 2014 00:38 in reply to "RE: Rooting for Samsung"
kwan_e Member since:
2007-02-18

""If you can't out-innovate, out-ligitate"


One can (and in my opinion) should make the counter argument which is that if you can't out-innovate, copy. That's what Samsung tried and will likely have to pay the piper for.
"

Innovation requires copying. Actually, a better word should be imitation. "Copy" is a charged word and implies an actual transfer and is conflated with imitation to make imitation sound unfair.

Reply Parent Score: 5