Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd May 2014 18:21 UTC, submitted by Shane
General Development

I was at the OpenStack Summit this week. The overwhelming majority of OpenStack deployments are Linux-based, yet the most popular laptop vendor (by a long way) at the conference was Apple. People are writing code with the intention of deploying it on Linux, but they're doing so under an entirely different OS.

But what's really interesting is the tools they're using to do so. When I looked over people's shoulders, I saw terminals and a web browser. They're not using Macs because their development tools require them, they're using Macs because of what else they get - an aesthetically pleasing OS, iTunes and what's easily the best trackpad hardware/driver combination on the market. These are people who work on the same laptop that they use at home. They'll use it when they're commuting, either for playing videos or for getting a head start so they can leave early. They use an Apple because they don't want to use different hardware for work and pleasure.

Apple's laptops are still the best PCs money can buy at the moment (despite their horribly outdated displays). It's no wonder Linux developers, too, favour them.

Thread beginning with comment 589456
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

It's the most universal, but also very shitty in any decent resolution. It's a crime against your eyes at anything above 1280x1024. It. Needs. To. Die.

Reply Parent Score: 0

Earl Colby pottinger Member since:

Buy better cables, my monitors look fine up 1600 x 1200 and one monitor is crisp and clear at 1920 x 1200 but only that one monitor.

Reply Parent Score: 4

Ultimatebadass Member since:

Good for you, but it will never beat a digital connection in image quality on the same hardware.

Reply Parent Score: 0