Linked by jessesmith on Wed 5th Nov 2014 10:39 UTC
Linux Over the past year I've been reading a lot of opinions on the new init technology, systemd. Some people think systemd is wonderful, the bee's knees. Others claim that systemd is broken by design. Some see systemd as a unifying force, a way to unite the majority of the Linux distributions. Others see systemd as a growing blob that is slowly becoming an overly large portion of the operating system. One thing that has surprised me a little is just how much people care about systemd, whether their opinion of the technology is good or bad. People in favour faithfully (and sometimes falsely) make wonderful claims about what systemd is and what it can supposedly do. Opponents claim systemd will divide the Linux community and drive many technical users to other operating systems. There is a lot of hype and surprisingly few people presenting facts.
Thread beginning with comment 599198
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Complexity
by hobgoblin on Thu 6th Nov 2014 18:47 UTC in reply to "RE: Complexity"
hobgoblin
Member since:
2005-07-06

There are ways around the /usr thing, but it depends on using a initramfs that do the initial boot and mount of /usr.

I think their plan is to use this for cloud VMs, so that a shared /usr can sit on a SAN and be mounted by any number of minimal VMs as they are spun up by the load balancer.

Frankly all that is coming out of systemd and Gnome these days seems oriented at two things.

1. cloud computing.
2. multi-seat government/military installations.

For either of these the feature set of systemd is pure gravy. but for most outside of that it is straight overkill.

Reply Parent Score: 4