Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Aug 2017 23:09 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes

Today, it hit me that iOS is already ten years old. I consider iOS a relatively new and fresh operating system, but can we really say that at ten years old? In order to figure that out, I quickly threw together a little graph to visualise the age of both current and deprecated operating systems to get a better look at the age of operating systems.

It counts operating system age in terms of years from initial public release (excluding beta or preview releases) to the last release (in case of deprecated operating systems) or until today (in case of operating systems still in active development). I've included mainly popular, successful, consumer-oriented operating systems, leaving out more server or embedded oriented operating systems (such as UNIX and QNX), which tend to have vastly different needs and development cycles.

As far as the nomenclature goes, Windows 9x includes everything from Windows 1.0 to Windows ME, and Mac OS covers System 1 through Mac OS 9.2.2. Windows CE is currently called Windows Embedded Compact, but its line also includes Windows Phone 7, Windows Mobile, and Windows PocketPC.

Red indicates the operating system is no longer being developed, whereas green means it's still under active development. The only question mark in this regard is Windows CE; its latest release is Embedded Compact 2013 in 2013, and while I think it's still in development, I'm not entirely sure.

This graph isn't a scientifically accurate, well-researched, quotable piece of information - it takes many shortcuts and brushes several questions aside for brevity's sake. For instance, looking at the last official release doesn't always make sense, such as with Windows Service Packs or Mac OS X point releases, and I haven't even been entirely consistent with these anyway.

On top of that, the graph doesn't take months or weeks into account, and just counts everything in terms of years. Linux shouldn't technically be included at all (since it's just a kernel), and you can conceivably argue that, for instance, Mac OS X is older than its initial release in the form of 10.0 since it's so heavily based on NEXTSTEP. Amiga OS is also a bit of a stretch, since its development pace is slow and has even died down completely on several occasions. You could maybe possibly argue that BeOS is still in active development in the form of Haiku, but I consider Haiku a reimplementation, and not a continuation.

In any event, I originally wasn't planning on doing anything with this, but I figured I might as well publish it here since it's an interesting overview.

Thread beginning with comment 647418
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Makes no sense
by Odwalla on Wed 2nd Aug 2017 01:41 UTC in reply to "Makes no sense "
Odwalla
Member since:
2006-02-01

MacOS hasn't been under active development since OS X was released in the early 2000s. Seventeen years is correct. The five years for BeOS is also correct. It started in 1991 but wasn't publicly available until 1995. Like MacOS it lasted until about the time OS X shipped. I think R5 released in 2000.

Edited 2017-08-02 01:44 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Makes no sense
by Morgan on Thu 3rd Aug 2017 14:17 in reply to "RE: Makes no sense "
Morgan Member since:
2005-06-29

I think R5 released in 2000.


Yep, August 2000, though it was still sold commercially until late 2001. I bought my copy of R5 in the summer of 2001. A few months later Be, Inc. folded.

Reply Parent Score: 2